MetincTrust
Sample · Illustrative data

AI Governance Readiness Report

This is an example of the free report you receive on completing the assessment. Figures are illustrative and informational only.

AI Trust Readiness Score
68
/ 100
Maturity:Defined
Residual risk:Moderate
Self-reported maturity
78
What you say is in place
Confidence score
63
How well claims appear supported
Evidence coverage
58%
Moderate

Domain scores

63
Governance & ownership
55
Inventory & use-case mapping
60
Data governance
74
Security & operations
70
Vendor & third-party
58
Transparency & human oversight
48
Monitoring & improvement

Top strengths

  • Named owner assigned for AI governance
  • SSO/MFA enforced for AI admin tooling
  • AI-specific risk review during vendor onboarding

Top gaps

  • No formal AI intake or approval workflow
  • Weak access controls before content enters the RAG index
  • Low evidence coverage behind stated controls

Priority recommendations

  1. P00–30 days
    Create and maintain an AI system inventory

    Stand up a single inventory of AI systems, copilots, agents, and AI-enabled workflows, each linked to an owner and intended purpose.

  2. P130–60 days
    Enforce access control before indexing RAG content

    Apply access controls and scoping before content enters the retriever/index, and add a process to remove stale or sensitive content.

  3. P130–60 days
    Define human review and override for material AI outputs

    Document where human review, intervention, or override applies when AI outputs could materially affect a person or business process.

In the full report

Detailed gaps, framework mapping & remediation roadmap

The full report adds control-by-control gap analysis, NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act mapping, a prioritized remediation roadmap, and benchmark context. A verified assessment adds analyst review and sampled evidence validation.

This report is illustrative and informational only. It is not a legal, security, compliance, audit, or certification determination.