AI-generatedMara Lindqvist
- Operator role
- provider
- Risk class
- high risk
- Assessment certainty
- 100 · High
- Classification
- Confidential
As a provider on a high risk path, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (39/100). You are strongest in human oversight & deployer controls; the most material exposure is in conformity, registration & value-chain duties. A legal hard blocker (e.g. conformity or registration) currently caps your score and blocks lawful launch.
Your results are available through this secure link.
The status takes precedence over the number. A prohibited-practice or unresolved classification caps or hides the score.
Reflects how complete and consistent your classification answers are. It never raises readiness.
Obligations that cap the score and cannot be averaged away. See findings below.
What this assessment indicates
As a provider on a high risk path, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (39/100). You are strongest in human oversight & deployer controls; the most material exposure is in conformity, registration & value-chain duties. A legal hard blocker (e.g. conformity or registration) currently caps your score and blocks lawful launch.
Legal hard-blocker findings
- Conformity route not completed before launch — caps the score at 39 · launch blocker.
- Required declaration/CE/registration missing — caps the score at 39 · launch blocker.
Domain performance
Score out of 100 · target 70Prioritized remediation roadmap
- P0Determine and complete conformity-assessment routeArt. 43Owner: Quality / LegalBefore continued use / 0–30 days
- P0Establish Article 17 quality-management systemArt. 17Owner: Quality / ComplianceBefore continued use / 0–30 days
- P0Strengthen control: Has the conformity assessment been completed before placing on the market / putting into service?—Owner: AI GovernanceBefore continued use / 0–30 days
Turn these findings into a compliance plan
Unlock the full report for an article-by-article gap analysis and conformity roadmap, or request a verified assessment with analyst review.
This is an informational, self-attested readiness result — not a legal opinion, certification, conformity assessment, CE marking, or guarantee that a regulator or court would reach the same conclusion. Hard blockers cap the score and cannot be averaged away; assessment certainty reflects classification completeness, not whether controls truly exist.
