MetincTrust
All sample reports
Mara LindqvistAI-generated
EU AI Act Readiness Report

Mara Lindqvist

Head of Product · EuroHire Cloud
Software / HR tech
Operator role
provider
Risk class
high risk
Assessment certainty
100 · High
Classification
Confidential

As a provider on a high risk path, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (39/100). You are strongest in human oversight & deployer controls; the most material exposure is in conformity, registration & value-chain duties. A legal hard blocker (e.g. conformity or registration) currently caps your score and blocks lawful launch.

Report saved

Your results are available through this secure link.

Executive summary
Readiness score
39/ 100
Material gaps
Launch blocker
Result status
Scored

The status takes precedence over the number. A prohibited-practice or unresolved classification caps or hides the score.

Assessment certainty
100High

Reflects how complete and consistent your classification answers are. It never raises readiness.

Legal hard blockers
2binding

Obligations that cap the score and cannot be averaged away. See findings below.

What this assessment indicates

As a provider on a high risk path, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (39/100). You are strongest in human oversight & deployer controls; the most material exposure is in conformity, registration & value-chain duties. A legal hard blocker (e.g. conformity or registration) currently caps your score and blocks lawful launch.

Strongest area
Human oversight & deployer controls
Primary exposure
Conformity, registration & value-chain duties
Immediate focus
Determine and complete conformity-assessment route

Legal hard-blocker findings

  • Conformity route not completed before launch — caps the score at 39 · launch blocker.
  • Required declaration/CE/registration missing — caps the score at 39 · launch blocker.

Domain performance

Score out of 100 · target 70
Human oversight & deployer controls
100
Scope, inventory & role accountability
58.9
Technical documentation, logs & transparency
52.9
AI literacy & governance
40
Risk classification & fundamental rights
40
Data & data governance
40
Accuracy, robustness & cybersecurity
40
Post-market monitoring & incident response
40
Risk management & quality management
26.2
Conformity, registration & value-chain duties
12.6
0–24 Critical25–49 At risk50–74 Moderate75–100 Strong

Prioritized remediation roadmap

  1. P0
    Determine and complete conformity-assessment route
    Art. 43Owner: Quality / LegalBefore continued use / 0–30 days
  2. P0
    Establish Article 17 quality-management system
    Art. 17Owner: Quality / ComplianceBefore continued use / 0–30 days
  3. P0
    Strengthen control: Has the conformity assessment been completed before placing on the market / putting into service?
    Owner: AI GovernanceBefore continued use / 0–30 days

Turn these findings into a compliance plan

Unlock the full report for an article-by-article gap analysis and conformity roadmap, or request a verified assessment with analyst review.

This is an informational, self-attested readiness result — not a legal opinion, certification, conformity assessment, CE marking, or guarantee that a regulator or court would reach the same conclusion. Hard blockers cap the score and cannot be averaged away; assessment certainty reflects classification completeness, not whether controls truly exist.