AI-generatedElena Duarte
- Actor role
- deployer
- Risk tier
- high
- Confidence
- 100 · High
- Lifecycle
- production
As a deployer on a high-risk production, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (41/100). You are strongest in map — context, intended purpose & impact profile; the most material gap is in manage — risk treatment, monitoring & improvement.
Your results are available through this secure link.
Confidence adjusts 41 → 41.
Reflects how complete and consistent your profile and current-state answers are. It never raises readiness.
Foundational gaps that cap the score and cannot be averaged away. See findings below.
What this assessment indicates
As a deployer on a high-risk production, your self-attested readiness is "Material gaps" (41/100). You are strongest in map — context, intended purpose & impact profile; the most material gap is in manage — risk treatment, monitoring & improvement.
Function performance
Score out of 100 · target 70Trustworthiness overlay
A secondary view of how your implemented controls map to NIST’s seven trustworthiness characteristics. It does not double-count into the four function scores.
Top strengths
- Is there a resourced inventory mechanism for AI systems, components and workflows? GOVERN 1.6
- Is the intended purpose, context of use, user population and deployment setting documented? MAP 1.1
Top gaps
- Are high-impact or irreversible actions gated by human approval or policy checks? Human oversight
- Can the organization pause, disable or revoke agent capabilities quickly? MANAGE 2.4
- Are agent tools and permissions limited by explicit purpose and risk tier? GOVERN / MANAGE
- Are external-system credentials, secrets and scopes managed securely? Security / resilience
- Are agent policies and runtime controls tested against adversarial prompts and tool-abuse scenarios? MS-2.7
Prioritized remediation roadmap
- P0Gate high-impact agent actions behind human approvalHuman oversightOwner: Platform / SecurityBefore launch/continued use / 0–30 days
- P0Implement a fast kill switch to pause or revoke agent capabilitiesMANAGE 2.4Owner: Platform / SecurityBefore launch/continued use / 0–30 days
- P0Implement GenAI content safety, provenance and misuse controlsAI 600-1Owner: Product / SecurityBefore launch/continued use / 0–30 days
Turn these findings into a remediation plan
Unlock the detailed report for a function-by-function gap matrix and a 30/60/90-day roadmap, or request a verified review with evidence and analyst input.
This is an informational, self-attested readiness result — not a NIST endorsement, certification, audit, conformity assessment, or proof that an AI system is safe, fair, valid or trustworthy. No documents or evidence were reviewed. Foundational caps prevent a strong area from hiding a missing foundation; the confidence score reflects how complete and consistent your answers are, not whether controls truly exist.